Internet Explorer wird von unserer Website nicht unterstützt. Um die Sicherheit Ihres Browsing-Erlebnisses zu erhöhen, verwenden Sie bitte Chrome, Safari, Firefox oder Edge.
Beliebt
Brandon Gleklen, Hailey Wilcox  |  August 27, 2025
Judicial Intelligence for High-Stakes Litigation: Why We’re Backing Bench IQ
Source: ChatGPT

In 2024, we wrote a blog post detailing a few major AI trends we were seeing in the legal space. After decades of slow tech adoption, it was clear that the legal industry was going to be proactive in adopting AI solutions. In a crowded landscape, we’ve looked for companies rethinking the most complex and consequential legal workflows from first principles.

And now, we are thrilled to introduce our investment in one of those legal AI applications we consider potentially transformative: Bench IQ*.

Bench IQ’s founders blend both a deep technical and legal DNA: CEO Jimoh Ovbiagele and CTO Max Isakov previously pioneered one of the first legal AI tools at ROSS Intelligence, while CCO Jeff Gettleman spent two decades litigating bankruptcies as a partner at Kirkland & Ellis. Jeff was looking for a leg up in court that would allow him to tailor his argument and strategies specifically to how a judge thinks – a task he knew would be prohibitively time-consuming and costly without the help of AI. Coupled with Jimoh’s and Max’s experience at ROSS Intelligence, the three set out to challenge the status quo for preparation, strategy, and confidence in the courtroom.

The need is clear. Selective legal publication rules result in the majority of judicial opinions going unpublished across the Court of Appeals and U.S. District Courts. As a result, lawyers don’t have access to the judicial reasoning and background that can be extremely informative to them as they try future cases before the same judges. Bench IQ replaces hunches and memory recall with hard intelligence and tailored insights.

Already, four of the top five Am Law 200 firms rely on Bench IQ when the stakes are highest, because understanding how a judge tends to rule can tilt an argument from persuasive to winning. It’s not just about shaving hours off research; it’s about showing litigators possibilities they haven’t had before.

We’re excited to be co-leading Bench IQ’s $5.3M seed financing round alongside Inovia Capital to arm litigators with the kind of intelligence that could decide lawsuits worth billions of dollars.

The information contained in this market commentary is based solely on the opinions of Brandon Gleklen and Hailey Wilcox, and nothing should be construed as investment advice. This material is provided for informational purposes, and it is not, and may not be relied on in any manner as legal, tax or investment advice or as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy an interest in any fund or investment vehicle managed by Battery Ventures or any other Battery entity. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors.

Die obigen Informationen können Prognosen oder andere zukunftsgerichtete Aussagen zu zukünftigen Ereignissen oder Erwartungen enthalten. Vorhersagen, Meinungen und andere Informationen, die in dieser Veröffentlichung diskutiert werden, können sich ständig und ohne Vorankündigung ändern und sind nach dem angegebenen Datum möglicherweise nicht mehr zutreffend. Battery Ventures übernimmt keine Verpflichtung und verpflichtet sich nicht, zukunftsgerichtete Aussagen zu aktualisieren.

* Denotes a Battery portfolio investment. For a full list of all Battery investments, klicken Sie hier.

Zurück zum Blog
DIESEN ARTIKEL TEILEN
TwitterLinkedInFacebookHacker-NewsRedditWhatsApp

Ein monatlicher Newsletter zum Austausch neuer Ideen, Erkenntnisse und Einführungen, um Unternehmer*innen beim Ausbau ihres Geschäfts zu helfen.

Abonnieren
Ähnliche ARTIKEL